Time for that bullet point format again:
*Following up on the NBA draft…the Boston Celtics did exactly what I thought they would do. Nothing. But this may be a good thing. Some dude named Robert Williams fell to them. Is this good? I don’t know. But the pundits seem to like it.
He is 6’10” and is apparently a “rim runner”…there are new terms coming out every day, folks. But he is also apparently a “rim protector”. A term of which I am familiar with. Never actually heard “rim runner” before. But maybe I’m just stupid and it has been around forever. Entirely possible.
In any event, he’s someone who can defend the basket but also score around the basket. So they say. After his freshman year at Texas A&M, he was supposedly a pretty good lottery pick but decided to stay his sophomore year. Then, he was still supposedly a pretty good lottery pick but dropped to #27.
Maybe doing stuff like oversleeping introductory conference calls and the like had something to do with the plummet. Hopefully, it’s as simple as that anyway.
In classic Jay Bilas-speak, Williams has great length and a tremendous wingspan.
Ok, enough of all that crap. The way I see it, if Williams can play defense around the basket and REBOUND, then we would be all jacked and pumped about him. If he kept Aron Baynes off the 2018-19 squad, we would be ecstatic. But we will see. Brad Stevens will probably have him working on his three-point game this offseason.
In any event, it looks like the C’s got someone out of the draft that could be at the very least a rotational player. Hard to argue with that at the end of the first round.
*Aside: There are 60 people drafted in each NBA draft. How many of those “make it”? 15-20? Half? Not that many. Add in some undrafted guys and you get a few more.
How did the draft used to be like 8 rounds? With fewer teams in the league? This has always confounded me.
*One dude who WASN’T drafted was LiAngelo Ball. My heart breaks. I wonder how LaVar really feels? I mean, that was a solid Foot Locker “One and Done” commercial, wasn’t it? Sigh…
*Speaking of undrafted dudes…we present you: Brad Wanamaker!! Seven years in Europe and now apparently heading to the Celtics. No idea, so don’t even ask.
But so much for the C’s going into next season with all the band coming back together (plus Williams) I am still not ruling out a major move. But wouldn’t shock me if there were many minor ones. A lot may depend on if Marcus Smart is back in the fold. I believe this will happen. But of course, there is a chance some team blows things right out of the water with a huge offer to him. We all know there are a lot of stupid teams out there…in every sport.
*As for the other draft we wrote on last, the Boston Bruins did exactly what I thought they would do as well…draft a bunch of guys that no one has ever heard of. And we will maybe or maybe not see some of them in 2 to 5 years. I think I’ll leave my comments at that. Since I have nothing else to say.
*In more positive news, the John Tavares talk has not quieted down. He is apparently meeting with the B’s at some point. I still see this whole union far-fetched. But the longer it goes on, perhaps not?
The cap has increased and supposedly they would have room as the roster currently stands to actually sign Tavares to a deal. Of course, they still need pieces, so players would still have to go. But this is a positive development as far as I can tell. I thought with all the bloated contracts the Bruins are carrying that they would no way in hell have space for a big-time addition. Not to mention the fact that I doubted Don Sweeney would go after a megastar, but that’s beside the point.
I still don’t have any idea how in the hell they will be able to move guys like David Krejci, David Backes and Torey Krug (if they wish) with their no-trade and no-movement clauses. I’ll let them figure that out on their own time though.
What a development that would be however if Tavares somehow actually came to town. Again, I don’t see it. But that just may be because I don’t want to get my hopes up.
*Thank God the NFL is kind of “off” for a while now. I don’t want to hear any more of Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski. Gronk may be the greatest to ever play tight end in the history of the NFL. Brady may be the best ever period. But shut up about having fun. 5 championships under the Bill Belichick regime is not fun? Tired of hearing about it.
It will be interesting to see how Brady does this upcoming year. 1. He doesn’t have a threat to his job to help motivate him. 2. He has skipped all voluntary work this offseason, which he does not typically do. And therefore he has not established connections with the new receivers and backs like he had always pledged was very important. 3. He is 41. There simply is no evidence of quarterbacks succeeding much at or beyond this age. Like it or not when we all talk about his age. It has to be factored in.
Personally? I think Brady will be fine. Maybe it will take some work to build some rapport with some of the receivers. But I’m convinced he’s doing the work he needs to do to be physically ready for the season. Same with Gronk. As much as Alex Guerrero appears to be a slimy dude, he got Gronk to stay healthy for an entire season last year. THAT happens once every blue moon. And Brady’s game was obviously MVP level last year. Would he really fall that precipitously? Doubtful…even at his age.
2019 though at 42? I’m not making any guarantees. That’s why I would have kept and franchised Jimmy Garoppolo last year, played him wherever possible this season and pretty much give him the keys to the operation next season. But maybe that’s why I’m not in an NFL front office. Actually, there are several reasons. But we don’t need to go through those here.
*Speaking of “tired of hearing about it”, I’m not sure I want to relive Deflategate with this Julian Edelman appeal. Jules is ready to battle to the end. And probably eventually lose and serve the four games anyway. Bud, you took something. Everyone does. You got caught. Please take the penalty and save us all the nonsense. Please…
Next: Random musings, Red Sox style…
What a season! All the way to Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals. Whoda thunk it?? Specifically, as the whole world knows, without their best two players? Just a crazy ride…and a helluva fun one.
Sure, if anyone on the team could throw the ball in the ocean in Game 7 against the Cavs, we’d all be looking at a Finals matchup with the Warriors. But who can really complain? The future is bright, my friends. Let’s enjoy this year for now, as the expectations will now soar for the future. This year, I was not feeling anything going into Game 7, figuring even getting to that point was gravy.
Next year? Us fans will be expecting more. As we should. And if they disappoint, we will sing a different tune for sure.
The Blowhard has a slew of thoughts about everything Celtics. Truth be told, they were part of an e-mail response to friends two days ago. So let’s make that a blog post!! Nothing like repurposing some content. But hey, it is what it is. Of course, we have to tidy some things up. And likely add some more. But here’s my favorite bullet point format, in no particular order:
*Some may be disappointed that the C’s are not facing Golden State in the NBA Finals and that it would be interesting to see how they match up against the best of the best. I am not sure I agree that it would have been great to see them keep playing…they would have gotten steamrolled/demolished/bludgeoned by the Warriors. Game 7 was surely a disappointing loss, but I think a silver lining COULD be that these guys know they should have won this series. This MAY light a little fire under the players this summer to work even harder than they already would have, knowing the missed opportunity that they had.
There is the possibility that if they won Game 7 and got to the Finals and then got smoked by Golden State maybe some players get their confidence shaken? Or even worse, knew they wouldn’t beat the Warriors, mailed it in to some degree, happy to at least get to the Finals without Kyrie and Gordon, and all along telling themselves that if they did have those two, they would have won the whole enchilada.
I don’t know, maybe I’m reaching. But I know for sure I would not have enjoyed them getting swept in the Finals, likely by large margins, at least in California.
*Many in the local area thought that if Houston was able to knock off Golden State, the Celtics would have a real chance to be NBA Champions if they got by the Cavs. I think that is kind of a dubious assumption. Even if the Rockets were to be without Chris Paul. The series would have been closer. But maybe 5 games instead of a sweep? Perhaps I am wrong about all of the above. But I feel like the train would have come to a screeching halt against either team.
*LeBron was LeBron in Game 7 and really, the whole series. In all ways. Punk move when he “blocked” (fouled) Rozier on the dunk attempt (dumb move by Rozier, by the way), then stood still and stared at what? The guy is one of the best players ever, maybe the best. But sorry, an absolute arseclown. It’s antics like this that make me despise him. Sure, all the greats have their “things”. Although generally a homer, I did not care for whenever Paul Pierce did stuff like this…wheelchair, bandages and all that. But LeBron takes these things to the next level with what he says, his mannerisms and everything all around. And of course, I will never forgive him for that ridiculous circus called “The Decision”.
*There were too many unnecessary switches in this series by the Celtics defense. And they all seemed to eventually end with Terry Rozier guarding LeBron. There has to be a better way.
*We have to all agree that it was a nice playoff run for the C’s. But we cannot discount the fact that the East was WEAK. My opinion, and perhaps my opinion alone. But…Cleveland WAS LeBron. Toronto choked, per usual. Philly fattened up their record at the end of the season against a slew of noncontenders. Miami, Milwaukee, Washington, Indy? Meh. There are some good players spread out over all of those teams. But any one of them could beat any one of them. I wasn’t impressed anyway.
*I have no doubt Danny Ainge won’t sit still this offseason. This team does still need some tweaks (and HAS to have some tweaks, kind of), even with the return of Irving and Hayward (and Daniel Theis and Shane Larkin, if you wish). I’m not saying he needs to make MAJOR moves, but I’m not ruling that out either if the right deal crosses his plate. I’m not talking just Anthony Davis or Karl Anthony Towns or any superstar along those lines. I’m talking any “right deal”. Of course, anyone would do the right deal, so this is not a big stretch. But still. Most people want Danny to just bring back the same team next year because they went so far this year without two horses. And I’m thinking he still may have one more huge one up his sleeve.
*I’d personally start by dealing Rozier…selling high if he didn’t torpedo any value he built up during the playoffs during his putrid Game 7. Or if teams look closer at his road splits. He is no more than a third guard to me. And I choose Marcus Smart as my third guard. Though Brad Stevens has to absolutely rein Smart in from shooting as much next year if he returns. This is a must.
I don’t hate Rozier. I don’t love him either…although I do love the way he rebounds as a guard. I am also not giving him away for nothing. But I’m thinking you can’t keep both him and Smart next season. Rozier did take a huge step up this year and I think they can package him with something else for something of value in return.
Now, I realize “Scary Terry” is a mere 3 million next year and also that Smart thinks he is worth more than 14 million. But Smart is a restricted free agent this offseason and Rozier will be restricted next season. With Irving and Hayward coming back, Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum deserving some more minutes next season as well, Marcus Morris and Al Horford also deserving of a decent amount of time…doesn’t something have to give?
Of course. And I think Rozier may have the most value of the guys listed above, that would be available I would say. And if somehow both he and Smart return next season, and Terry is only getting 18-20 minutes a game, that may not end up well either.
If someone pays Smart what he wants, then all of the above is moot I guess…he won’t be here. But I’m thinking teams will not pay him and he will be back. I’ve been wrong before though…
*I’m also not sure Morris a lock to return. I was just told that he is kind of like a mentor and big brother to Brown and Tatum though (thanks Mike F.!). I had not heard this before. And quite frankly, this scares the bejesus out of me. Morris is a good player and had a good year. But he is a lunatic. Certifiably insane. Not sure he is the guy that I want mentoring my young studs. But maybe he is a softie in the locker room, I don’t know.
*Aron Baynes is absolutely brutal. Worst rebounding form I think I may have ever seen from a big man. Horrible touch around the basket (what’s his percentage on tip-ins? 33%?). Defense? Mediocre as far as I am concerned. I simply can’t watch him. And whose great idea was it to have him start shooting threes? Cuz he made a couple against Philly? Ugh…maybe I am being harsh. But I’m thinking you can find someone with his skill set for less than the 4.328 mil he made this year.
*I’m not trading Tatum, under any circumstances. It would be hard for me to trade Brown at this point, despite his ups and downs. But there is room on Players #5-#17 (#18?) to make some moves to help the team, however minor if “minor” is the way that Danny ends up going. Although “Player #5” would be Al Horford and I suppose if they were working him into a deal, his max contract isn’t exactly “minor”.
*If they want to fill a back-end roster spot, I’d re-sign that Jonathan Gibson dude that shot the lights out the last couple of games of the regular season. If all this team wants to do is shoot threes, that guys shooting ability has to mean more to the C’s than a lot of other things, no?
*I’m not sure why Greg Monroe got buried as the playoffs went on. I know, he doesn’t play D. But he scores and rebounds. Could have used a few of each. Couldn’t he have played decent D against someone like Tristan Thompson in this series to “hide” him in that regard? Some may think he looked completely lost when he was out there. But I think they could’ve thrown him in there for a few minutes at a time and he could have been all right.
That’s about it…for now, anyway. Great run and yet again it will be another interesting offseason. Does Danny bring everyone back? Does he just make minor moves? Or is one more big splash in the offing? He could go in any direction and no one really knows.
But with rumors milling around already about Ainge trying to move up in the draft and get a big guy or some other top talent it seems we are off to a flying start to the offseason!
Picking up right where we left off…just remember, DEMETRIUS JACKSON. Ok, I will stop yelling now that I have your attention. On to the rest of the roster, still in alphabetical order…
*Jonas Jerebko/Amir Johnson. I’m going to lump these two together. Because I can. And they are next to each other on the roster. More importantly, it’s because I thought neither one of their options should have been picked up before the season. To me, it was a colossal waste of 17 million for a combined 36 minutes a game for these stiffs. They couldn’t have paid one player the whole 17 mil and received a better return?
Harsh assessment? Most assuredly. But it is what it is.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: I have no idea what Johnson brings to the table. None. Doesn’t rebound. Doesn’t block shots. Doesn’t score. Defense? Perhaps. But when I watched him, he didn’t make much of a difference. Never comes up with a “50/50 ball”. Etc. Yet he started almost every game this year. Oh, if you take away Jackson’s 1 for 1 on threes, then Amir led the team in three-point percentage. Yup. 27 for 66, for 41%. And yes, I just looked it up. Actually, I was looking for something (anything?!) Johnson contributed and stumbled upon that nugget. I know, only 66 threes attempted, so big deal. But if you asked anyone if they thought Amir shot that many threes this season, they wouldn’t believe it either (10 for 43 for 23% last year, by the way…found that interesting as well). So I guess I discovered something he did add to the mix.
You know what else I realized about Johnson? That he was the second highest paid Celtic this year. A distant second to Al Horford, but second highest nonetheless. Yikes!!
I know, Johnny Kid…you will disagree with the above analysis. But that’s how I saw it…
As for Jerebko, well, I didn’t have much love for him either. He sure as hell hustles his arse off and can hit the occasional three himself. But…seemingly takes up space for the most part.
I can’t even talk about these guys anymore. I hope neither of them are back. Although if Brad Stevens uses Jonas going forward like he did at the end of the playoffs, which is…barely…then if he wants to come back for a veteran minimum salary and there were open roster spots, I wouldn’t complain…too much. Johnson? I wish him well at his next stop. If there is one…
*Jordan Mickey/James Young. Uh oh. There goes the alphabetical order! But it made sense to lump these guys together. Plus, “Y” does come after “M”, you know.
Before the season, I had high hopes for both of these guys. I had no idea if either of these two could play in the NBA. Unfortunately, I still don’t. That’s what happens when these guys apparently drew straws for the 13th and final active roster spot on a nightly basis.
With the way this team was sure to have (and did have) problems rebounding, I was hoping Mickey would get some minutes to try to help that problem. Young, being his third year but still only 21, I was hoping for him to get minutes to see if he would finally develop into something useful. Neither one got those minutes because they went to Gerald Green, Jerebko, Johnson, etc.
We already know what the veteran bench guys can do. We didn’t (don’t) know what Mickey or Young can do. Maybe it’s nothing. Maybe they just sucked really bad at practice and they didn’t ultimately “earn” their time. But it would have been nice to find out about them in real games.
Based on the above, I don’t see either back next year. Young is unrestricted anyway. Mickey has non-guaranteed money, but doesn’t seem likely the Cs will guarantee it.
I have no idea why, but I bought into the Young hype from Day One. Left school early, top 10 talent if he stayed in school (“they” say anyway), steal for where they took him in the draft (17th), etc. I’ve always had this vision that he is like Jermaine O’Neal. Not the style of play of course. Not the “Boston Celtic years Jermaine O’Neal”. But the O’Neal that came into the league at 18 years old, languished on the bench in Portland for 4 years, then blossomed into an All-Star as soon as he went to Indiana.
Yeah, Young probably doesn’t turn out to be anything. But please note both he and Jermaine were taken at #17 in the first round of their respective drafts. So if my hunch is right…somebody owes me something…
*Kelly Olynyk. Who do I dislike more, Johnson or Olynyk? It’s close. If “Game 7 against the Wizards Kelly Olynyk” showed up more, it’s obviously a lot easier to trash on Amir. Goes without saying. But unfortunately, THAT guy shows up once every 40 games or so. Or something like that. It’s mostly the abundantly average KO that is around most of the time. So it makes the decision tougher.
Listen, Olynyk will always be better than I will ever give him credit for. It’s just that I like my 7-footers to be able to rebound and play down low. And he can’t. Which infuriates me a little as well because it looks like he may actually have some ability down inside, believe it or not. I know, this is Brad’s system and that’s what he wants Kelly to do…blah, blah, blah. I get it. But I don’t have to like it.
As for next year, Olynyk is a restricted free agent coming off 3.1 mil this year. If you ask me, I let him walk. He will want a nice raise, for whatever reason. But look closely at the numbers. Four years in the league and no improvement really. He has essentially been the same guy for those four years. Is he all of a sudden take a step up in his age 26-27 season next year? Or beyond? Doubtful. So why give this guy a fat raise for that? He is what he is and there is some value to that. Just not the value in dollars he likely will be looking for. Let him go.
Honestly though, I think Danny makes a good effort to keep him, sad to say. It probably depends on what they do with the guards and who they bring in and all that. He may not fit financially when all the chips fall into place. But Danny does try to keep him here.
*Terry Rozier/Marcus Smart. Pairing these guys up based on position…and length of this post! Smart played pretty much starters minutes and Rozier was essentially your 4th guard. Rozier seems like he may be the better ballhandler and rebounder, Smart could possibly have the better all around game when you throw in his D. Both are 23 years old with birthdays in March, so there’s that. Even better, they were the only Celtics to shoot less than 40% from the field (about 36% apiece for both), so I suppose there are some similarities.
Despite the fact that he shoots entirely too much and no one bothers reining him in, and despite the fact that he can still be a knucklehead at times, Smart grew on me this past season. If Avery Bradley is indeed moved as I think, I believe Smart moves into the starting lineup and takes another step up. Just a gut feeling.
Rozier? Don’t be shocked if he is moved either. Yes, he could step up to be the primary backup guard. I can’t say I would be opposed to that, as he showed some growth between his rookie and sophomore years in the NBA. But I have other ideas for the #3 guard. One could be Jaylen Brown, as discussed in the previous post. Brown filled in there when Bradley missed time earlier in the year. If Jae Crowder stays, Brown has to get more minutes somewhere. And he no doubt has more upside than Rozier.
I have another player in mind for the #3 guard. That’s a story for a different day however.
Next: Still a big name missing…