Back To Earth?
Been over two months since I wrote about the Boston Bruins. Since…before the season started. Solid work, I know.
Does this now mean that I am “ready for hockey”? If you remember, I wasn’t ready for the start of the hockey season in early October. It seemed like the previous season had just ended.
Welp, we are almost halfway through the NHL season, so I’d better be!
Wait, halfway through already??
Yup. 36 games in. 82 game season. Honestly, doesn’t seem real.
So I guess it’s time to say SOMETHING about the local hockey team.
So what do we say?
If you also recall, I was not excited about the Bruins’ prospects this season. Not because they aren’t a talented squad. But because it was a long year last year, one that ended in disappointment. Then, General Manager Donnie Sweeney brought basically the same team back this year. In my opinion, this is not a recipe for success. We’ve seen it many times before. In more than one sport. I’ve always felt a team in that position needs a little turnover the following season. Keeps hunger in the room. My opinion anyway.
Then the B’s started 20-3-5 (or 20-8 for people that have no interest in tracking overtime and shootout losses).
Maybe that’s why I hadn’t written anything? Because I looked like an idiot?
Nah. Though if you wish to think that, please feel free to do so.
Of course, seeing that I am choosing to write now in the recent 1-4-3 (1-7!) stretch over the last 8 games would lend some credence to that theory as well. Wouldn’t blame you either way.
But the bottom line is that football has just taken precedence. It’s fall. Autumn, if you will. It’s football season!! To wit, we haven’t written about the Boston Celtics in a couple months either.
Sssssssooooo…what do we think of the Boston Bruins as we sit here right now? Funny thing is, I feel EXACTLY the same as before Game Number One of this regular season.
You know I am never going to change my tune on goaltender Tuukka Rask. There has never been a lot of love from me headed in his direction. Again, he should be ok splitting with Jaroslav Halak all year. But it doesn’t mean I have to like him.
My main concern is basically the same concern we have had for quite some time around here. This is still a “one-line” team. Patrice Bergeron centering Brad Marchand and David Pastrnak. That’s it. Sorry.
Can you honestly tell me otherwise? I mean, just cuz you hand Charlie Coyle 31.5 mil over the next 6 years doesn’t mean he is all of a sudden a first line forward.
Yeah, that contract was a little much. Listen, Coyle is a nice player. And maybe he can play wing on the second line. Maybe. But that may have been money better spent elsewhere.
OR…you couldn’t have signed him for like 4-5 years at 4 mil per? Someone was going to give him more?
In any event, what is the second line technically right now? David Krejci, Jake DeBrusk and…Danton Heinen? DeBrusk and Heinen seem to be the best of the young guys that were drafted in recent years. But honestly, that is not saying much. I keep waiting for Jake to kind of explode. But it hasn’t happened. Heinen appears to be a third liner at absolute best to me. I guess Donnie Hockey and the brass like his defense. Which is all well and good. But if you are playing on an offensive line, it would be nice to see some points come along with the D. Maybe that’s just me though…
Anders Bjork has shown some promise. Perhaps Karson Kuhlman develops. Or Jack Studnicka. But these guys aren’t top six guys anytime soon. Not this year anyway.
The rest of the roster is littered with Sean Kuraly, Brett Ritchie and Chris Wagner types. Speaking of Wagner, he’s a nice 4th liner. But was it necessary to lock him up for three more years? I’m just not a fan of handing long-term contracts to bottom of the roster guys. They are a dime a dozen. Makes me think of former GM Peter Chiarelli handing those out with no movement clauses like it was Halloween candy.
But I digress…
The point is, where is the scoring coming from after the first line? Same question as before the season. Not to mention that when scoring on the top line dries up, how is that going to look?
I’ll tell you. 1-4-3…or 1-7, to be precise.
Pastrnak has cooled off (and he wasn’t scoring like 75 goals this season anyway just so you know). Marchand hasn’t scored in over 10 games. And Bergeron has missed some games this year.
And not much is being done along the rest of the lineup to pick up the slack. Nor do I expect any of those players to.
Speaking of scoring, the overtime and shootout record of the Bruins is jarring. 2-3 in OT and ZERO AND FIVE in the shootout.
That is pathetic. And although I don’t have the lineups that coach Bruce Cassidy throws out there each time they enter a shootout. I can’t imagine he has many choices on who to pick. Other than Pastrnak I would say. Marchand’s career shootout numbers are not good. Who else can you depend on there to snipe one home? Not even Bergy, I have to say.
Midseason moves? Maybe. We are still several weeks away from the trade deadline.
But who are you going to go get? And with extremely limited cap space, how good is that player (those players?) actually going to be?
I don’t see much coming for reinforcements. Not from outside the organization anyway. That leaves the likes of Kuhlman and Studnicka. Hopefully not the likes of minor league veteran Paul Carey.
I did not see the Bruins starting out as hot as they did. But the end result will be the same, unfortunately. A playoff spot for sure. Then I’m predicting a fairly quick exit.
Prove me wrong. There is plenty of time to do that.
Posted on December 20, 2019, in Uncategorized and tagged Boston Bruins, Brad Marchand, Bruce Cassidy, Charlie Coyle, David Pastrnak, Don Sweeney, goalies, NHL, offense, Peter Bergeron, Salary cap, secondary scoring, shootout, Stanley Cup, Tuukka Rask. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.